![]() ![]() Nevertheless, it’s important to remain mindful of the low points-if only to ward off hubris while reminding seafarers that institutions must keep up with changing times or find themselves irrelevant. ![]() Change a variable or two and you may get an entirely different outcome. Now, we shouldn’t wallow in long-ago defeats: strategist Bernard Brodie cautions that major fleet duels are “few and far between even as centuries are reckoned.” When sample size = small, it’s best not to read too much into the results of any individual encounter. Problem is, we have a habit of discovering it is broke at the worst possible time-when fixing things gets dicey.ĭespite its record of victory, America’s navy is far from exempt from the universal proclivity to celebrate success. Or as the old adage goes: if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. As philosophers say, past success and the timber of humanity predispose individuals and groups to keep doing what worked last time. Winning, on the other hand, can dull the mind-reaffirming habits and methods that may prove ill-suited when the world changes around us. Defeat clears the mind, putting the institution on “death ground”-in other words, compelling it to either adapt or die. They supply a better reality check than victories. And yet debacles oftentimes have their uses. That’s natural, isn’t it? Winning is the hallmark of a successful team, losing a hateful thing. People and the institutions they comprise commonly tout past triumphs while soft-pedaling setbacks. James Holmes, Professor at the US Naval War College – It’s crucial to remember and learn from defeat. The 5 Worst Defeats of the US Navy, as explained by Dr.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |